Starlink is quietly moving its satellites closer to Earth and there’s a reason | – The Times of India

Most people never think about where satellites sit once they reach space. They simply assume they stay put, doing their job far above the atmosphere. But for companies operating thousands of spacecraft, orbit height is not a fixed choice. It is a constant calculation. SpaceX has now decided to shift that balance. In 2026, Starlink will begin lowering the orbit of its satellites from around 550 kilometres to about 480 kilometres above Earth. The move is not about faster internet or new services. It is about safety. After a rare satellite failure late last year, the company appears to be taking a slower, more careful look at how crowded low Earth orbit has become.

Starlink wants to lower the orbit of its satellites to make them safer

According to Reuters, all Starlink satellites currently operating near 550 kilometres will be moved down to 480 kilometres over the course of 2026. The change will happen gradually rather than all at once.Michael Nicolls, SpaceX’s vice president of Starlink engineering, said the goal is to condense the constellation into a lower and less crowded orbital band. Below 500 kilometres, there are fewer satellites and fewer pieces of tracked debris. That alone reduces the chance of collisions.Lower orbits also mean satellites fall back to Earth faster at the end of their life, burning up in the atmosphere instead of lingering as space junk.

Why does lower orbit matter for safety

Space around Earth is getting busy. Over the past few years, thousands of satellites have been launched by governments and private companies. Many are clustered in similar altitude ranges.When satellites operate higher up, they stay in orbit longer if something goes wrong. A dead satellite at 550 kilometres can remain there for years. At 480 kilometres, atmospheric drag pulls objects down much faster.If a satellite fails, it becomes less of a long term hazard. That difference may seem small on paper, but across thousands of spacecraft, it adds up.

The failed Starlink satellite

The decision follows an unusual incident in December. One Starlink satellite experienced what SpaceX described as an anomaly while orbiting at around 418 kilometres.The spacecraft suddenly lost altitude by about four kilometres, suggesting some kind of internal failure or explosion. It also created a small amount of debris and stopped communicating with ground control.While SpaceX stressed that such kinetic accidents are rare, the event highlighted the risks of operating large constellations. Even one malfunctioning satellite can add to congestion in already busy orbital paths.

Is Starlink the biggest player in orbit now

Yes. SpaceX has quietly become the world’s largest satellite operator. Starlink now consists of nearly 10,000 satellites providing broadband internet to homes, businesses, governments, and remote regions.The scale is unmatched. That size brings influence but also responsibility. When one company controls so much of low Earth orbit, its decisions shape conditions for everyone else.Lowering the constellation suggests SpaceX is responding to growing concerns from regulators, astronomers, and other satellite operators about orbital crowding.

Will this affect internet service?

SpaceX has not indicated that users will notice any difference. Starlink satellites already operate in relatively low orbits compared to older communication satellites.Lowering them slightly should not disrupt coverage. In some cases, it could even improve latency. But SpaceX has been careful not to frame the move as a performance upgrade.The focus remains on reducing collision risk and managing long-term sustainability.

Is this part of a wider shift in space operations

There is a growing awareness that space is not limitless. Every launch adds objects that must be tracked, avoided, and eventually removed.Governments and companies are starting to accept that managing satellite traffic is as important as launching rockets. Lower orbits, controlled deorbiting, and transparency about failures are becoming part of that conversation.Starlink’s decision fits into this quieter shift. It is not dramatic. It does not promise new features. It simply moves thousands of machines a little closer to Earth, where mistakes fade faster. In a crowded sky, that restraint may matter more than ambition.