Judge to rule on Donald Trump’s bid to delay hush money sentencing
0 3 mins 3 mths


Republican presidential nominee and former US President Donald Trump speaks during a visit to Alro Steel manufacturing plant in Potterville, Michigan, US August 29, 2024. — Reuters
Republican presidential nominee and former US President Donald Trump speaks during a visit to Alro Steel manufacturing plant in Potterville, Michigan, US August 29, 2024. — Reuters

NEW YORK: A New York judge is expected to rule on Friday on Donald Trump’s request to push back sentencing in his hush money criminal case until after the November 5 election.

The former US president is scheduled to be sentenced on September 18, less than two months before the election in which Trump is the Republican nominee for president.

Trump’s lawyers in August urged Justice Juan Merchan to push back the date, citing “naked election-interference objectives.” Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, who brought the charges, is a Democrat.

Bragg’s office took no position on Trump’s request. The prosecutors said in a Thursday night court filing that the judge told the parties he would decide on Friday.

In the first criminal trial of a former or current US president, Trump was convicted on May 30 of falsifying business records to cover up his then lawyer’s $130,000 payment to adult film actress Stormy Daniels for her silence before the 2016 election about a sexual encounter she says she had with Trump a decade earlier.

Trump denies the encounter and has vowed to appeal the verdict.

Falsifying business records is punishable by up to four years in prison, though sentences such as fines or probation are more common.

In pushing for Merchan to delay sentencing, Trump’s lawyers also argued there would not be enough time before the sentencing to potentially appeal the judge’s forthcoming ruling on Trump’s request to overturn the conviction due to the US Supreme Court’s July 1 decision on presidential immunity.

Merchan is scheduled to rule on that motion on September 16.

The Supreme Court’s 6-3 ruling, which related to a separate criminal case Trump faces, found that presidents cannot be criminally prosecuted for their official acts, and that evidence of presidents’ official actions cannot be used in criminal cases involving unofficial actions.

Bragg’s office argued its case involved Trump’s personal conduct, so the verdict should stand.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *